TedTest

From the Ted Talk by Jacy Reese Anthis: Why we should end animal agriculture

Unscramble the Blue Letters

one we can tackle with the tloos of Effective Altruism ... their grniowg mindset in charity, business and politics of using evidence-based rceasreh to find and implement the most effective solutions to the world's begsgit problems. The most powerful tool we have is innovation. The amazing thing is that we don't have to give up meat, diray, or eggs to end animal farming. Think about it: what's meat? It's fat, protein, water and trace minerals. All these idenetingrs are readily available in the plant kingdom. They're just not assembled in the architecture of meat. That's what a cow does. But a cow also does a lot of stuff we don't need. She grows hair, tteeh, bones. She walks around; she bahetres, tiknhs, and feels. These extra processes mean that for every 10 calories of plant-based food we feed a farmed animal, we get around 1 calorie of meat in rturen. Even with the nutrient ainaml products are most known for, protein, for every 10 gmars of plant-based, we get, at most, 2 grams of animal-based. So what if we asemebsld these ingredients ourselves with a more efficient, ethical process? That's the approach of companies like Beyond Meat, Hungry Planet, and Impossible Foods. They've already succeeded in making a beef burger made from plants. Many consumers can't even tell the deceffnire. Today, they're just perfecting that product and snalcig up the process to lower costs and widen distribution. In fact, the Beyond Burger pictured here is already available in Mississippi. But let's be cautious. What if courmsens are really picky? What if they don't just want something that tastes like animal meat, but something that is actually made from animal cells? Well, there's good news. Scientists and chefs have been working on so-called clean meat, real meat made without the food safety and ethical cost of animal slaughter. To do this, they take a small sample of cells from a living animal and place those clels in a cultivator, which looks like one of the big takns at a beer brewery. Inside, the cells mix with the nutrients they need to grow in the same process that happens inside an animal's body, and voila! You can have your cow and eat beef too. (Laughter) But you might be thinking, "Not all bfeeniical tgoenhoeicls are wlediy adtpeod, right? So what if something goes worng? What if the technology is fully deeoepvld, but perceived as just another food for vegetarians? Or what if an irresponsible company lets their product get contaminated, ledaing to a ccasade of nivgatee psers that cripples the industry?" With conventional meat, we see contamination scandals all the time, but for a young industry like clean meat, it could be fatal. It's like self-driving cars, where the istnurdy needs to be especially careful about cilsnoolis, despite having an overall better safety record. So what social chagne will we see on our way to an animal-free food system? The biggest one is a shfit beyond the individual and towards institutional change. Like I said earlier, advocates have thus far fesucod haveliy on one-by-one diet change, but I believe we'll see the biggest changes happen with changes to institutions like businesses, government, ninrftoops and society as a whole. There's a lot of evidence that this strategy is more effective. Last year, I was at a protest, cllinag for a restaurant chain to reform its animal-welfare policies, just basic stuff, like choosing healthier breeds of cchkiens, or having windows in the chicken sheds. A pedestrian walked up and thnkead me profusely for helping these poor animals. I told him he was welcome to join us, as bystanders sometimes do, and he said, "Oh no, no, no. I can't. I'm not a vegetarian." I insisted that he was welcome to join us without being vaartieegn. We were just calling for better treatment for these animals. But he was unconvinced. He saw vegetarianism as a prerequisite to helping farmed aalimns because advocates have conflated the two for so long. If we had, instead, used an institutional frianmg, that bystander might have joined us and maybe become vegetarian along the way. This sgtreaty also helps people avoid what psychologists call "the collapse of compassion," the feeling of apathy that comes when we encounter a big problem without clearly seeing the big soultoin. The institutional framing puts that solution, changing sctoeiy as a whole, front and center in our messaging. This strategy is also well-evidenced by historical social mnomteves, which is what I spend most of my time researching. Virtually no movements - from environmentalism, children's rights, antislavery, feminism to antiwar movements - have succeeded with the hvaey, individual focus that we see in the farmed-animal movement. Consumer advocacy like boycotts have scdeeuecd when used as tools for institutional change, but failed when treated as an end goal. We need to learn from the past. The second big change is a shift beyond opposition to factory farming alone and towards opposition to animal farming as whole. There's a lot of evidence for this strategy too. First, nmuouers investigations have swohn that so-called humane farms are rarely humane in practice. The most picturesque farm I've ever been on was an award-winning California egg farm. But because of the farm's natural and organic policies, they didn't vaccinate the bidrs or give them antibiotics, like factory farms do. This led to atrocious health. I saw many cases of Marek's, a higlhy contagious disease that often leads to blindness and missing eyes; fuild belly, some birds with over a pound of fluid buildup inside their less than five-pound bodies; fanugl infections; lice on almost all of them; and many birds crippled by eggs that had gotten stuck inside them on the way out. I've been dismayed that the reality of these farms is nearly as bad as factory farming. While reduction in suffering is something we should applaud, and it can be a step towards abolition, the umetgiitnad suffering is still a moral catastrophe. Second, simply the idea that there are humane ways to raise and kill animals for food is a huge rocdabolk, even if you just oppose factory farming. Seventy-five percent of people think they usually eat meat from animals who were treated humlneay, but as we saw eaerlir, less than 1% of fmared animals actually live on non-factory famrs. That's crazy, right? Why are consumers so confused? Well, when we eat animals, there's a cvgoitnie dissonance that clwas at us because deep down, we care about animals too. What seems to happen is that our subconscious protects us from this dissonance by creating a psychological refuge. It tells us that, actually, everything is okay, that farmed animals are treated well, even when the facts point in the opposite dteiicorn. This mistaken belief protects us from the conflict between our values and our biovhaer. And the misleading labels on animal products, like pictures of green pastures on cartons of frcaoty farm eggs, ebcxtaeare this issue. Finally, these farms are just too enivxsepe to feed this hungry planet. So-called humane animal products are already several times the normal price. Many of us just can't afford that. And the demand on natural resources is just too much for this planet to bear, especially when we can get the same foods from more sustainable sources. flunaetorty, the future is bright. Today, we're at an inflection point, where the moral reasons to change our food system are very compelling. teohclgony is on its way and excellent alternatives are already here, and advocates are wising up to more impactful strategies. It's incredibly empowering to have this wealth of evidence available, from history, psychology and elsewhere, to analyze using the effective altruism pceveirtspe. Ultimately, that evidence stguesgs that we can achieve a truly humane food system if we srvite towards the end of animal farming. And pibluc opinion is already a lot further along on this than you might think. Forty-seven pnreect of US adults already say they spourpt a ban on slaughter houses. As we troaitnsin, as we align our food sysetm with our vlueas, we're going to see a sweeping change in the rhioietlasnp between humans and the other inhbnaattis of this planet. Once we're no longer eating animals three times a day, we'll see a huge relief in cognitive dissonance that frees our conscience to expand our moral circle to not just farmed animals, but other populations like dogs and cats in shelters, animals used in circuses and ernnnmttaeiet, and the vast number of wild animals who also need our help. Today, we're laying the foundation for future social movements just as social movements of the past laid the bedrock we now stand on. Richard Branson peertcidd that the food system will be animal-free in just 30 years. It might take a little lgoenr than that, but it's caler that huge change is coming. You can stand on the right side of history and play a role in this exciting movement, whether it's by starting a business like a local raenrsuatt or a clean-meat cmpnaoy, becoming an activist, mkniag a donation, or simply sharing content on social media. You can, of course, also ptrciptiaae as a coounscis consumer, but keep in mind that your own diet cchioe is just one of many ways to have an impact. This is a time of unbridled excitement and opportunity, as we look ahead at one of the next great social movements. Humanity's moral circle will continue to expand, but only if people like you and me take hold. Thank you. (Applause)

Open Cloze

one we can tackle with the _____ of Effective Altruism ... their _______ mindset in charity, business and politics of using evidence-based ________ to find and implement the most effective solutions to the world's _______ problems. The most powerful tool we have is innovation. The amazing thing is that we don't have to give up meat, _____, or eggs to end animal farming. Think about it: what's meat? It's fat, protein, water and trace minerals. All these ___________ are readily available in the plant kingdom. They're just not assembled in the architecture of meat. That's what a cow does. But a cow also does a lot of stuff we don't need. She grows hair, _____, bones. She walks around; she ________, ______, and feels. These extra processes mean that for every 10 calories of plant-based food we feed a farmed animal, we get around 1 calorie of meat in ______. Even with the nutrient ______ products are most known for, protein, for every 10 _____ of plant-based, we get, at most, 2 grams of animal-based. So what if we _________ these ingredients ourselves with a more efficient, ethical process? That's the approach of companies like Beyond Meat, Hungry Planet, and Impossible Foods. They've already succeeded in making a beef burger made from plants. Many consumers can't even tell the __________. Today, they're just perfecting that product and _______ up the process to lower costs and widen distribution. In fact, the Beyond Burger pictured here is already available in Mississippi. But let's be cautious. What if _________ are really picky? What if they don't just want something that tastes like animal meat, but something that is actually made from animal cells? Well, there's good news. Scientists and chefs have been working on so-called clean meat, real meat made without the food safety and ethical cost of animal slaughter. To do this, they take a small sample of cells from a living animal and place those _____ in a cultivator, which looks like one of the big _____ at a beer brewery. Inside, the cells mix with the nutrients they need to grow in the same process that happens inside an animal's body, and voila! You can have your cow and eat beef too. (Laughter) But you might be thinking, "Not all __________ ____________ are ______ _______, right? So what if something goes _____? What if the technology is fully _________, but perceived as just another food for vegetarians? Or what if an irresponsible company lets their product get contaminated, _______ to a _______ of ________ _____ that cripples the industry?" With conventional meat, we see contamination scandals all the time, but for a young industry like clean meat, it could be fatal. It's like self-driving cars, where the ________ needs to be especially careful about __________, despite having an overall better safety record. So what social ______ will we see on our way to an animal-free food system? The biggest one is a _____ beyond the individual and towards institutional change. Like I said earlier, advocates have thus far _______ _______ on one-by-one diet change, but I believe we'll see the biggest changes happen with changes to institutions like businesses, government, __________ and society as a whole. There's a lot of evidence that this strategy is more effective. Last year, I was at a protest, _______ for a restaurant chain to reform its animal-welfare policies, just basic stuff, like choosing healthier breeds of ________, or having windows in the chicken sheds. A pedestrian walked up and _______ me profusely for helping these poor animals. I told him he was welcome to join us, as bystanders sometimes do, and he said, "Oh no, no, no. I can't. I'm not a vegetarian." I insisted that he was welcome to join us without being __________. We were just calling for better treatment for these animals. But he was unconvinced. He saw vegetarianism as a prerequisite to helping farmed _______ because advocates have conflated the two for so long. If we had, instead, used an institutional _______, that bystander might have joined us and maybe become vegetarian along the way. This ________ also helps people avoid what psychologists call "the collapse of compassion," the feeling of apathy that comes when we encounter a big problem without clearly seeing the big ________. The institutional framing puts that solution, changing _______ as a whole, front and center in our messaging. This strategy is also well-evidenced by historical social _________, which is what I spend most of my time researching. Virtually no movements - from environmentalism, children's rights, antislavery, feminism to antiwar movements - have succeeded with the _____, individual focus that we see in the farmed-animal movement. Consumer advocacy like boycotts have _________ when used as tools for institutional change, but failed when treated as an end goal. We need to learn from the past. The second big change is a shift beyond opposition to factory farming alone and towards opposition to animal farming as whole. There's a lot of evidence for this strategy too. First, ________ investigations have _____ that so-called humane farms are rarely humane in practice. The most picturesque farm I've ever been on was an award-winning California egg farm. But because of the farm's natural and organic policies, they didn't vaccinate the _____ or give them antibiotics, like factory farms do. This led to atrocious health. I saw many cases of Marek's, a ______ contagious disease that often leads to blindness and missing eyes; _____ belly, some birds with over a pound of fluid buildup inside their less than five-pound bodies; ______ infections; lice on almost all of them; and many birds crippled by eggs that had gotten stuck inside them on the way out. I've been dismayed that the reality of these farms is nearly as bad as factory farming. While reduction in suffering is something we should applaud, and it can be a step towards abolition, the ___________ suffering is still a moral catastrophe. Second, simply the idea that there are humane ways to raise and kill animals for food is a huge _________, even if you just oppose factory farming. Seventy-five percent of people think they usually eat meat from animals who were treated ________, but as we saw _______, less than 1% of ______ animals actually live on non-factory _____. That's crazy, right? Why are consumers so confused? Well, when we eat animals, there's a _________ dissonance that _____ at us because deep down, we care about animals too. What seems to happen is that our subconscious protects us from this dissonance by creating a psychological refuge. It tells us that, actually, everything is okay, that farmed animals are treated well, even when the facts point in the opposite _________. This mistaken belief protects us from the conflict between our values and our ________. And the misleading labels on animal products, like pictures of green pastures on cartons of _______ farm eggs, __________ this issue. Finally, these farms are just too _________ to feed this hungry planet. So-called humane animal products are already several times the normal price. Many of us just can't afford that. And the demand on natural resources is just too much for this planet to bear, especially when we can get the same foods from more sustainable sources. ___________, the future is bright. Today, we're at an inflection point, where the moral reasons to change our food system are very compelling. __________ is on its way and excellent alternatives are already here, and advocates are wising up to more impactful strategies. It's incredibly empowering to have this wealth of evidence available, from history, psychology and elsewhere, to analyze using the effective altruism ___________. Ultimately, that evidence ________ that we can achieve a truly humane food system if we ______ towards the end of animal farming. And ______ opinion is already a lot further along on this than you might think. Forty-seven _______ of US adults already say they _______ a ban on slaughter houses. As we __________, as we align our food ______ with our ______, we're going to see a sweeping change in the ____________ between humans and the other ___________ of this planet. Once we're no longer eating animals three times a day, we'll see a huge relief in cognitive dissonance that frees our conscience to expand our moral circle to not just farmed animals, but other populations like dogs and cats in shelters, animals used in circuses and _____________, and the vast number of wild animals who also need our help. Today, we're laying the foundation for future social movements just as social movements of the past laid the bedrock we now stand on. Richard Branson _________ that the food system will be animal-free in just 30 years. It might take a little ______ than that, but it's _____ that huge change is coming. You can stand on the right side of history and play a role in this exciting movement, whether it's by starting a business like a local __________ or a clean-meat _______, becoming an activist, ______ a donation, or simply sharing content on social media. You can, of course, also ___________ as a _________ consumer, but keep in mind that your own diet ______ is just one of many ways to have an impact. This is a time of unbridled excitement and opportunity, as we look ahead at one of the next great social movements. Humanity's moral circle will continue to expand, but only if people like you and me take hold. Thank you. (Applause)

Solution

biggest
cells
strive
longer
growing
strategy
difference
participate
predicted
developed
beneficial
consumers
clear
nonprofits
suggests
society
framing
adopted
leading
humanely
support
industry
technology
cascade
choice
collisions
transition
fluid
relationship
restaurant
perspective
press
company
system
shift
inhabitants
chickens
percent
claws
movements
fortunately
exacerbate
ingredients
thinks
widely
cognitive
earlier
expensive
farmed
calling
direction
farms
birds
roadblock
vegetarian
focused
factory
animals
conscious
heavy
behavior
return
thanked
animal
shown
dairy
wrong
solution
heavily
highly
scaling
succeeded
tools
public
change
assembled
negative
fungal
numerous
making
breathes
technologies
grams
tanks
values
teeth
unmitigated
research
entertainment

Original Text

one we can tackle with the tools of Effective Altruism ... their growing mindset in charity, business and politics of using evidence-based research to find and implement the most effective solutions to the world's biggest problems. The most powerful tool we have is innovation. The amazing thing is that we don't have to give up meat, dairy, or eggs to end animal farming. Think about it: what's meat? It's fat, protein, water and trace minerals. All these ingredients are readily available in the plant kingdom. They're just not assembled in the architecture of meat. That's what a cow does. But a cow also does a lot of stuff we don't need. She grows hair, teeth, bones. She walks around; she breathes, thinks, and feels. These extra processes mean that for every 10 calories of plant-based food we feed a farmed animal, we get around 1 calorie of meat in return. Even with the nutrient animal products are most known for, protein, for every 10 grams of plant-based, we get, at most, 2 grams of animal-based. So what if we assembled these ingredients ourselves with a more efficient, ethical process? That's the approach of companies like Beyond Meat, Hungry Planet, and Impossible Foods. They've already succeeded in making a beef burger made from plants. Many consumers can't even tell the difference. Today, they're just perfecting that product and scaling up the process to lower costs and widen distribution. In fact, the Beyond Burger pictured here is already available in Mississippi. But let's be cautious. What if consumers are really picky? What if they don't just want something that tastes like animal meat, but something that is actually made from animal cells? Well, there's good news. Scientists and chefs have been working on so-called clean meat, real meat made without the food safety and ethical cost of animal slaughter. To do this, they take a small sample of cells from a living animal and place those cells in a cultivator, which looks like one of the big tanks at a beer brewery. Inside, the cells mix with the nutrients they need to grow in the same process that happens inside an animal's body, and voila! You can have your cow and eat beef too. (Laughter) But you might be thinking, "Not all beneficial technologies are widely adopted, right? So what if something goes wrong? What if the technology is fully developed, but perceived as just another food for vegetarians? Or what if an irresponsible company lets their product get contaminated, leading to a cascade of negative press that cripples the industry?" With conventional meat, we see contamination scandals all the time, but for a young industry like clean meat, it could be fatal. It's like self-driving cars, where the industry needs to be especially careful about collisions, despite having an overall better safety record. So what social change will we see on our way to an animal-free food system? The biggest one is a shift beyond the individual and towards institutional change. Like I said earlier, advocates have thus far focused heavily on one-by-one diet change, but I believe we'll see the biggest changes happen with changes to institutions like businesses, government, nonprofits and society as a whole. There's a lot of evidence that this strategy is more effective. Last year, I was at a protest, calling for a restaurant chain to reform its animal-welfare policies, just basic stuff, like choosing healthier breeds of chickens, or having windows in the chicken sheds. A pedestrian walked up and thanked me profusely for helping these poor animals. I told him he was welcome to join us, as bystanders sometimes do, and he said, "Oh no, no, no. I can't. I'm not a vegetarian." I insisted that he was welcome to join us without being vegetarian. We were just calling for better treatment for these animals. But he was unconvinced. He saw vegetarianism as a prerequisite to helping farmed animals because advocates have conflated the two for so long. If we had, instead, used an institutional framing, that bystander might have joined us and maybe become vegetarian along the way. This strategy also helps people avoid what psychologists call "the collapse of compassion," the feeling of apathy that comes when we encounter a big problem without clearly seeing the big solution. The institutional framing puts that solution, changing society as a whole, front and center in our messaging. This strategy is also well-evidenced by historical social movements, which is what I spend most of my time researching. Virtually no movements - from environmentalism, children's rights, antislavery, feminism to antiwar movements - have succeeded with the heavy, individual focus that we see in the farmed-animal movement. Consumer advocacy like boycotts have succeeded when used as tools for institutional change, but failed when treated as an end goal. We need to learn from the past. The second big change is a shift beyond opposition to factory farming alone and towards opposition to animal farming as whole. There's a lot of evidence for this strategy too. First, numerous investigations have shown that so-called humane farms are rarely humane in practice. The most picturesque farm I've ever been on was an award-winning California egg farm. But because of the farm's natural and organic policies, they didn't vaccinate the birds or give them antibiotics, like factory farms do. This led to atrocious health. I saw many cases of Marek's, a highly contagious disease that often leads to blindness and missing eyes; fluid belly, some birds with over a pound of fluid buildup inside their less than five-pound bodies; fungal infections; lice on almost all of them; and many birds crippled by eggs that had gotten stuck inside them on the way out. I've been dismayed that the reality of these farms is nearly as bad as factory farming. While reduction in suffering is something we should applaud, and it can be a step towards abolition, the unmitigated suffering is still a moral catastrophe. Second, simply the idea that there are humane ways to raise and kill animals for food is a huge roadblock, even if you just oppose factory farming. Seventy-five percent of people think they usually eat meat from animals who were treated humanely, but as we saw earlier, less than 1% of farmed animals actually live on non-factory farms. That's crazy, right? Why are consumers so confused? Well, when we eat animals, there's a cognitive dissonance that claws at us because deep down, we care about animals too. What seems to happen is that our subconscious protects us from this dissonance by creating a psychological refuge. It tells us that, actually, everything is okay, that farmed animals are treated well, even when the facts point in the opposite direction. This mistaken belief protects us from the conflict between our values and our behavior. And the misleading labels on animal products, like pictures of green pastures on cartons of factory farm eggs, exacerbate this issue. Finally, these farms are just too expensive to feed this hungry planet. So-called humane animal products are already several times the normal price. Many of us just can't afford that. And the demand on natural resources is just too much for this planet to bear, especially when we can get the same foods from more sustainable sources. Fortunately, the future is bright. Today, we're at an inflection point, where the moral reasons to change our food system are very compelling. Technology is on its way and excellent alternatives are already here, and advocates are wising up to more impactful strategies. It's incredibly empowering to have this wealth of evidence available, from history, psychology and elsewhere, to analyze using the effective altruism perspective. Ultimately, that evidence suggests that we can achieve a truly humane food system if we strive towards the end of animal farming. And public opinion is already a lot further along on this than you might think. Forty-seven percent of US adults already say they support a ban on slaughter houses. As we transition, as we align our food system with our values, we're going to see a sweeping change in the relationship between humans and the other inhabitants of this planet. Once we're no longer eating animals three times a day, we'll see a huge relief in cognitive dissonance that frees our conscience to expand our moral circle to not just farmed animals, but other populations like dogs and cats in shelters, animals used in circuses and entertainment, and the vast number of wild animals who also need our help. Today, we're laying the foundation for future social movements just as social movements of the past laid the bedrock we now stand on. Richard Branson predicted that the food system will be animal-free in just 30 years. It might take a little longer than that, but it's clear that huge change is coming. You can stand on the right side of history and play a role in this exciting movement, whether it's by starting a business like a local restaurant or a clean-meat company, becoming an activist, making a donation, or simply sharing content on social media. You can, of course, also participate as a conscious consumer, but keep in mind that your own diet choice is just one of many ways to have an impact. This is a time of unbridled excitement and opportunity, as we look ahead at one of the next great social movements. Humanity's moral circle will continue to expand, but only if people like you and me take hold. Thank you. (Applause)

Frequently Occurring Word Combinations

ngrams of length 2

collocation	frequency
animal farming	6
food system	6
farmed animals	6
factory farming	4
social movements	3
green pastures	2
factory farms	2
natural resources	2
effective altruism	2
animal products	2
cognitive dissonance	2
moral circle	2

Important Words

abolition
achieve
activist
adopted
adults
advocacy
advocates
afford
align
alternatives
altruism
amazing
analyze
animal
animals
antibiotics
antislavery
antiwar
apathy
applaud
applause
approach
architecture
assembled
atrocious
avoid
bad
ban
basic
bear
bedrock
beef
beer
behavior
belief
belly
beneficial
big
biggest
birds
blindness
body
bones
boycotts
branson
breathes
breeds
brewery
bright
buildup
burger
business
businesses
bystander
bystanders
california
call
calling
calorie
calories
care
careful
cars
cartons
cascade
cases
catastrophe
cats
cautious
cells
center
chain
change
changing
charity
chefs
chicken
chickens
choice
choosing
circle
circuses
claws
clean
clear
cognitive
collapse
collisions
coming
companies
company
compassion
compelling
conflated
conflict
confused
conscience
conscious
consumer
consumers
contagious
contaminated
contamination
content
continue
conventional
cost
costs
cow
crazy
creating
crippled
cripples
cultivator
dairy
day
deep
demand
developed
diet
difference
direction
disease
dismayed
dissonance
distribution
dogs
donation
earlier
eat
eating
effective
efficient
egg
eggs
empowering
encounter
entertainment
environmentalism
ethical
evidence
exacerbate
excellent
excitement
exciting
expand
expensive
extra
fact
factory
facts
failed
farm
farmed
farming
farms
fat
fatal
feed
feeling
feels
feminism
finally
find
fluid
focus
focused
food
foods
fortunately
foundation
framing
frees
front
fully
fungal
future
give
goal
good
government
grams
great
green
grow
growing
grows
hair
happen
health
healthier
heavily
heavy
helping
helps
highly
historical
history
hold
houses
huge
humane
humanely
humans
hungry
idea
impact
impactful
implement
impossible
incredibly
individual
industry
inflection
ingredients
inhabitants
innovation
insisted
institutional
institutions
investigations
irresponsible
issue
join
joined
kill
kingdom
labels
laid
laughter
laying
leading
leads
learn
led
lets
lice
live
living
local
long
longer
lot
making
meat
media
messaging
mind
mindset
minerals
misleading
missing
mississippi
mistaken
mix
moral
movement
movements
natural
negative
news
nonprofits
normal
number
numerous
nutrient
nutrients
opinion
opportunity
oppose
opposition
organic
participate
pastures
pedestrian
people
perceived
percent
perfecting
perspective
picky
pictured
pictures
picturesque
place
planet
plant
plants
play
point
policies
politics
poor
populations
pound
powerful
practice
predicted
prerequisite
press
price
problem
problems
process
processes
product
products
profusely
protects
protein
protest
psychological
psychologists
psychology
public
puts
raise
rarely
readily
real
reality
reasons
record
reduction
reform
refuge
relationship
relief
research
researching
resources
restaurant
return
richard
rights
roadblock
role
safety
sample
scaling
scandals
scientists
sharing
sheds
shelters
shift
shown
side
simply
slaughter
small
social
society
solution
solutions
sources
spend
stand
starting
step
strategies
strategy
strive
stuck
stuff
subconscious
succeeded
suffering
suggests
support
sustainable
sweeping
system
tackle
tanks
tastes
technologies
technology
teeth
tells
thanked
thinking
thinks
time
times
today
told
tool
tools
trace
transition
treated
treatment
ultimately
unbridled
unconvinced
unmitigated
vaccinate
values
vast
vegetarian
vegetarianism
vegetarians
virtually
walked
walks
water
ways
wealth
widely
widen
wild
windows
wising
working
wrong
year
years
young